Who we are and where we come from – end to the rot in our national cultural institutions?

After a hiatus of ten long years Australia finally has a new national cultural policy that maps out what the current Albanese Government plans to do in support of Australian culture and creativity. At first glance the new policy appears to be an arts policy, rather than a broader cultural policy, but on closer scrutiny it is connected to far wider initiatives. Part of a series of three articles that consider different aspects of the cultural policy, this article looks at the boost to the national collecting institutions which collect and safeguard Australia's cultural heritage, outlining how after decades of damage from the so-called efficiency dividend, these institutions, amongst our most important publically-owned assets, might just have been saved. The first article looks at the policy generally and outlines some of the major components it will deliver. The second article is about the connection between the policy and broader social and economic features, such as the cultural economy and First Nations economic development.

Finally, after decades of neglect, this Government has seen fit to start to address the dire state of our national cultural institutions. These are the publically-owned institutions which belong to the Australia people and which play a crucial national role in supporting and preserving Australia’s culture and heritage. Yet over decades their work has been steadily and stealthily crippled by the operation of the ‘efficiency dividend’ the 1.25 per cent annual levy introduced in 1987 by the Hawke government and continued by Government under both major parties ever since.

This is an automatic bureaucratic mechanism which through its cumulative impact cuts support for the work of the organisations at the very time it needs to be expanded to service the growing needs of an expanding population and economy – it is about everything but efficiency. This was a crucial issue recognised by Arts Minister Crean at the time of the last national cultural policy. 

The National Film and Sound Archive, one of nine national collecting institutions which received a funding boost in the 2023-24 Budget as part of the delivery of the new national cultural policy.

Much of what is happening to these national organisations is also occurring at state level to state cultural institutions of national significance. The disappointing and badly thought through changes to the once-mighty Powerhouse Museum are a good example. These organisations are very different to Government departments, which have much more room to adjust to major cuts. They have very specific requirements to operate effectively, including a body of highly specialised expertise, with staff with long-established international and national professional networks to facilitate their roles.

The whole picture – an arts and cultural policy for everyone and everything

After a hiatus of ten long years Australia finally has a new national cultural policy that maps out what the current Albanese Government plans to do in support of Australian culture and creativity. At first glance the new policy appears to be an arts policy, rather than a broader cultural policy, but on closer scrutiny it is connected to far wider initiatives. Part of a series of three articles that consider different aspects of the cultural policy, this second one is about the connection between the policy and broader social and economic features, such as the cultural economy and First Nations economic development. The first one looks at the policy generally and outlines some of the major components it will deliver. The third article looks at the boost to the national collecting institutions which collect and safeguard Australia's cultural heritage.

The new national cultural policy is big, but is it big enough to encompass all those parts of Australian society and economy that are connected to and influenced by creativity and culture? It is crucial for the success of the policy that it stretches far beyond the arts sector. Burke has stressed the broader remit of the policy. Before the policy was released he made a profound point – even if it should be obvious, but usually isn’t. Stressing the importance of the policy, he said: ‘This is not just an arts policy. Cultural policy, when you get it right, affects how you run your health policy. It affects how you run your veterans affairs policy, it affects your industrial relations policy, it affects how you conduct your trade and your foreign affairs.’ 

 Joining the cultural economy dots: wedding dress and underskirt worn by Miranda Tapsell in the film Top End Wedding, exhibited in the Piinpi touring exhibition at the National Museum of Australia (originally curated by Bendigo Art Gallery). The piece is a collaboration between print designer Bede Tungutalum, joint founder of Tiwi Design, designer Heather Wallace and costume maker Robyn Trott.

Missed opportunity
When Burke was Shadow Minister for Arts and also Multicultural Affairs I noted repeatedly that he was in the ideal position to connect the innovative power of cultural diversity to the Opposition’s promised new cultural policy. Unfortunately this new policy misses an important opportunity to highlight this crucial feature of contemporary Australian society and culture and its implications for economic resilience and innovation. However, in this Government Burke now has another role, that of Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations, and he is doing with that position exactly what I had hoped he would do with Multicultural Affairs – connect the dots, as Simon Crean used to say repeatedly.

Time to revive with renewed national cultural policy

After a hiatus of ten long years Australia finally has a new national cultural policy that maps out what the current Albanese Government plans to do in support of Australian culture and creativity. The previous policy, announced by the Gillard Labor Government in 2013, was a very good policy, even though it had its gaps, but its impact was cut short by what turned out to be a series of Governments that managed to steadily become worse the longer they were in office. At first glance the new policy appears to be an arts policy, rather than a broader cultural policy, but on closer scrutiny it is connected to far wider initiatives, including some that have never been included in a cultural policy before. Part of a series of three articles that consider different aspects of the cultural policy, this first one looks at the policy generally and outlines some of the major components it will deliver. The second article is about the connection between the policy and broader social and economic features, such as the cultural economy and First Nations economic development. The third article looks at the boost to the national collecting institutions which collect and safeguard Australia's cultural heritage.

While I was away in New Zealand in February and March this year I saw that on 30 January 2023 the Albanese Labor Government and its Minister for the Arts, Tony Burke, had released ‘Revive’, its new National Cultural Policy. According to the release material, it’s ‘a 5-year plan to renew and revive Australia's arts, entertainment and cultural sector. It delivers new momentum so that Australia's creative workers, organisations and audiences continue to thrive and grow, and so that our arts, culture and heritage are re-positioned as central to Australia's future.’ With the announcement of the 2023-24 Budget, which will help deliver the new policy, it's timely to consider it in more detail.

The new national cultural policy may not be the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, but it is important and it fills a ten-year gap since the last national cultural policy. It provides a vision and framework that maps out what the Albanese Government will do to support and foster arts, creativity and culture.

 ‘It is of special interest to me since I was the director of the taskforce that co-ordinated the production of the last one under the previous Labor Government back in 2012. Even though it had its gaps, that was a very good policy, with its impact cut short by what turned out to be a series of Governments that managed to steadily become worse the longer they were in office.’

As I noted at the time, it is of special interest to me since I was the director of the taskforce that co-ordinated the production of the last one under the previous Labor Government back in 2012. Even though it had its gaps, that was a very good policy, with its impact cut short by what turned out to be a series of Governments that managed to steadily become worse the longer they were in office.

Too soon to tell - is the Powerhouse Museum saved and what happens next?

Over the years I have written several articles about the decline of the once mighty Powerhouse Museum, one of the gems of Sydney and an internationally renowned institution. It was steadily undermined by a State government more at ease with pork-barrelling the suburbs it had long neglected than fostering a great museum and major tourist attraction. Rather than extending and upgrading the museum into the Western suburbs, it seemed intent on establishing a de facto entertainment and functions centre in Parramatta. Now, with a new State Government, that all may have changed.

My next planned article was going to be about the recently announced new national cultural policy of the Albanese Labor Government, but with the Powerhouse issue raising its head again, I thought I’d publish something now. The article about the national cultural policy will follow soon.

The view of the Catalina flying boat from the mezzanine floor above - the former Members Lounge where I used to work from 1995 to 2000.

Hope of end to a debacle
Hopefully, with the election of the Minns Labor Government in NSW, there may be some hope of an end to this embarrassing debacle with the Museum, though there are no guarantees. What is clear is that whatever happens next is under close scrutiny. There is plenty of room to enhance the Powerhouse – however care needs to be taken not to throw the baby out with the bathwater. It's also important not to lose a once in a lifetime opportunity – decoupled from the Parramatta option – to make the Powerhouse truly the great museum it could be. For example here has long been an ambition to turn the Museum around so it is no longer limited to an entrance from busy Harris Street in Ultimo and instead connects to Darling Harbour – despite all the limitations of that precinct.

I include extracts from a breaking update distributed on behalf of the broad alliance that has been battling for years to reverse this policy failure and halt the sad decline of the Museum.