National Arts Minister, Mitch Fifield, has said that being a
strong advocate for the arts doesn’t mean delivering government funding and
that an arts Minister or a government shouldn’t be judged just on the quantum
of money the government puts in. This sidesteps the Government’s very real
problems that it has muddied the waters of existing arts funding, cutting many
worthwhile organisations loose with no reason, that rather than delivering arts
funding, it has reduced it significantly, and that it has no coherent strategy
or policy to guide its arts decisions or direction. The real issue is that a
national framework, strategy or policy for arts and culture support underpins
and provides a rationale for arts funding – and is far more important.
In a speech at the National Press Club on 16 March,
Australian Government Arts Minister, Mitch Fifield, commented about his joint
responsibilities, ‘As Minister for Communications and the Arts I see myself as
having responsibility for both the sinews and the soul of the nation. The
sinews through Communications and the soul through the Arts. The sinews being
that which is essential, connective and often unseen. And the soul, well the
closest any minister comes to that in a secular, pluralistic democracy is the
Arts Minister’.
 |
| Policy helps to see the wood despite the trees and also helps to see both through the fog of daily Government chaos. |
Government funding less important
His speech was almost exclusively about media reform but in
questions afterwards he made some telling comments, which thankfully have been
reported by Deborah Stone in ‘
ArtsHub’.
He said that being a strong advocate for the arts doesn’t mean delivering
government funding. He noted ‘I do consider myself to be a strong advocate for
the arts. The arts isn’t something that should be seen as a luxury. The arts isn’t
something that should be seen as an extra. The arts are core to who we are as a
nation. They are core to how we express ourselves and how we interpret our past
and how we look to the future. So the arts are core business for government.
But it’s not just something for Government. Yes it’s appropriate that
government provides funding to support the arts across the genres, but it is
also important that the Government money is used to leverage philanthropic,
corporate and individual dollars into the sector. So I don’t think an arts
Minister or a government should be judged just on the quantum of money that
government puts in. But we do put significant dollars into support for the
arts.’